[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #16432 [Core Tor/Torsocks]: patches for NetBSD

#16432: patches for NetBSD
-------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 Reporter:  cypherpunks        |          Owner:  dgoulet
     Type:  defect             |         Status:  needs_information
 Priority:  Medium             |      Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Torsocks  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal             |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  netbsd             |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                     |         Points:
 Reviewer:                     |        Sponsor:
-------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Changes (by dgoulet):

 * status:  accepted => needs_information
 * severity:   => Normal


Comment:

 I've merged all first three patch. The fourth one confuses me. Why is it
 better to use negative here? There are much more systems that it might not
 work with a "blacklist" system than a "whitelist" one.

 Should the `__NetBSD__` check be removed from that line for it to simply
 work?

 {{{
 #if (defined(__linux__) || defined(__darwin__) ||
 (defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) && defined(__i386__)) || defined(__NetBSD__))
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16432#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs