Re: [tor-bugs] #5323 [Analysis]: Decide whether letting the read bucket go negative is actually helping us

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <torproject-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#5323: Decide whether letting the read bucket go negative is actually helping us
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
    Reporter:  arma      |       Owner:                         
        Type:  task      |      Status:  closed                 
    Priority:  normal    |   Milestone:                         
   Component:  Analysis  |     Version:                         
  Resolution:  wontfix   |    Keywords:  performance flowcontrol
      Parent:  #4682     |      Points:                         
Actualpoints:            |  
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Changes (by arma):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => wontfix


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:3 arma]:
 > On further thought, there may be more variables here than I'd hoped.
 Specifically, if we stop reading the rest of the tls record, there will be
 nothing that notices that we should read the rest of it next time around
 (see #5324).

 Closing since there's a lot of hacking work to be done before the code
 change would actually do what I wanted. Oh well.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5323#comment:4>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs