[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #4086 [Analysis]: Compare performance of TokenBucketRefillInterval params in simulated network
#4086: Compare performance of TokenBucketRefillInterval params in simulated
network
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Analysis | Version:
Keywords: performance flowcontrol | Parent: #4465
Points: | Actualpoints:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment(by arma):
Replying to [comment:9 robgjansen]:
> Replying to [comment:8 Flo]:
> > Thanks for the results and the great work. Overall it looks very good
and promising: Web clients benefit most from the smaller refill intervals
and data transmission is smoothed. Though, I'm a little surprised by the
divergence of the red line (100ms) on page 4 of Kevin's runs. For me the
outlier looks like an anomaly/ artifact. Are there any reasons which
explain such a behavior?
>
> Comparing Kevin's page 4 to page 4 of my refill-perf-ewma0.pdf would
suggest that Kevin's 10 ms line is the anomaly/artifact, not the 100 ms
line. Things are better when CircuitPriorityHalflife is set.
Exciting. I'm curious how stable these results are when you (and Kevin) do
another run. Are some of the lines we're looking at (and trying to read
meaning into) just randomly drawn? :)
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4086#comment:14>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs