[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #8163 [Tor]: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit

#8163: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma      |          Owner:                     
     Type:  defect    |         Status:  new                
 Priority:  normal    |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.4.x-final 
Component:  Tor       |        Version:  Tor: 0.2.4.10-alpha
 Keywords:  tor-auth  |         Parent:                     
   Points:            |   Actualpoints:                     
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------

Comment(by nickm):

 So, do we in fact have an idea of how to fix this? We could try to
 grandfather in whichever nodes are currently in the consensus directory,
 but as soon as nodes drop out once, we'll be out of luck.  We could go
 with whichever node has been around the longest -- the one with the
 highest total_weighted_time or highest weighted_uptime in its rephist.
 Any other thoughts?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8163#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs