[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #11325 [Tor]: RFE: Adhere to XDB base directory specification

#11325: RFE: Adhere to XDB base directory specification
----------------------------+---------------------------------------
     Reporter:  jamielinux  |      Owner:
         Type:  defect      |     Status:  new
     Priority:  minor       |  Milestone:  Tor: unspecified
    Component:  Tor         |    Version:  Tor: unspecified
   Resolution:              |   Keywords:  tor-client xdg-compliance
Actual Points:              |  Parent ID:
       Points:              |
----------------------------+---------------------------------------
Changes (by nickm):

 * priority:  trivial => minor
 * keywords:   => tor-client xdg-compliance
 * milestone:   => Tor: unspecified


Comment:

 What would be the benefit of users to adopting this standard?  What
 operating systems support it?

 I'm not categorically opposed to "adhering" to this specification, but I'd
 like to know a bit more about what the point is supposed to be.

 (XDG_CACHE_HOME would not be appropriate -- only some of the files are
 cache files.  The "state" file, for example, is not cached information,
 and treating it as safe-to-delete would degrade security.  The "keys"
 subdirectory may contain sensitive private keys, and the "lock" file goes
 wherever locks go.)

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/11325#comment:1>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs