[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #18611 [Tor]: Improve semantics for pluggable transports with dummy addresses
#18611: Improve semantics for pluggable transports with dummy addresses
--------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: teor | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.???
Component: Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: meek | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
--------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by yawning):
Hm, I'd need to look at the conflict resolution stuff. I assume the ideal
behavior is "non-conflicting as long as at least one of transport,
ip/port, fingerprint is different". This is sort of a moot point because
existing 0.2.7.x behavior is going to be preserved (As in, internal
address/ports specified on a bridge line do not get rejected).
Replying to [comment:2 nickm]:
> Basically, having the "destination address" implicit and the "proxy
address" explicit was probably a mistake, and we kinda have a transition
plan, if we ever get around to making it happen.
*bangs head on keyboard* I still think the current model is fine.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18611#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs