Re: [tor-bugs] #22079 [Community]: Community governance documents

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#22079: Community governance documents
-----------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  alison     |          Owner:  alison
     Type:  project    |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium     |      Milestone:
Component:  Community  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal     |     Resolution:
 Keywords:             |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:             |         Points:
 Reviewer:             |        Sponsor:
-----------------------+------------------------

Comment (by arma):

 Replying to [comment:7 nickm]:
 >   * Possibly, unanimity should not be required; best effort unanimity,
 falling back to unanimity-minus-one, may be enough.

 I think when writing the council guidelines we didn't provide anywhere
 near this level of instruction for the council members.

 I think (at present) that means it's up to the council to figure out how
 it functions.

 I see that this could be problematic, e.g. if some council people disagree
 about how things should be done, so writing down more of the expectations,
 though constraining, could also be freeing.

 I heard that a lot of what the first (elected) council did was to try to
 decide about its policies and procedures in more detail. Maybe we can ask
 them to publish some of those choices, and we can codify the ones we like,
 and/or help to identify areas where the current instructions are too
 vague?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/22079#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs