Re: [tor-bugs] #28158 [Core Tor/sbws]: Consider writing bw lines even if the min percentage has not been reached

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#28158: Consider writing bw lines even if the min percentage has not been reached
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
 Reporter:  juga                                 |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  enhancement                          |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium                               |      Milestone:  sbws:
                                                 |  unspecified
Component:  Core Tor/sbws                        |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal                               |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  sbws-1.0-must-moved-20181128, sbws-  |  Actual Points:
  11x-final-removed-20190312,                    |
  sbws-110-proposed, changes-version-minor,      |
  sbws-110-removed-20190312                      |
Parent ID:                                       |         Points:  1
 Reviewer:                                       |        Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------

Comment (by teor):

 Replying to [comment:10 juga]:
 > Replying to [comment:9 teor]:
 > > We need to be able to explain to a relay operator why sbws has
 excluded their relay.
 > > How can we do that if we don't do this ticket?
 >
 > Hmm, do you think we can postpone this after #28547 is implemented so
 that we confirm why `sbws` is excluding more relays than Torflow?.

 We can see if #28547 helps us work out why relays are not being measured.
 But if relays are never measured, we will need to implement this ticket to
 see them in the v3bwfile.

 > Have there been so far questions like this (with Torflow)?.
 > Do you know where would be the place where a relay operator would look
 at to search for this type of information?.

 Torflow does not provide much diagnostic information per relay.
 sbws need to provide better information, so we can fix the bugs that make
 it worse than torflow.

 The votes provide a small amount of information, it is available in
 consensus-health in the big relay table:
 https://consensus-health.torproject.org/consensus-
 health-2019-03-13-10-00.html#000A10D43011EA4928A35F610405F92B4433B4DC

 There are bw and bwauth lines for each relay in consensus-health.

 > If we add them, just without `bw` key so that Tor doesn't parse it,
 relay operators will see their relay, but still might question why it is
 not `measured` in the consensus.

 We have this ticket so we can answer the questions that relay operators
 ask when their relays are not measured.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/28158#comment:11>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs