[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #33491 [Core Tor/Tor]: tor_bug_occurred_: Bug: src/core/or/dos.c:697: dos_new_client_conn: Non-fatal assertion !(entry == NULL) failed. (Future instances of this warning will be silenced.) (on Tor 0.4.2.6 )
#33491: tor_bug_occurred_: Bug: src/core/or/dos.c:697: dos_new_client_conn: Non-
fatal assertion !(entry == NULL) failed. (Future instances of this warning
will be silenced.) (on Tor 0.4.2.6 )
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: sjcjonker | Owner: dgoulet
Type: defect | Status:
| merge_ready
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.4.4.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version: Tor:
| 0.3.3.2-alpha
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: consider-backport-after-0434, tor- | Actual Points:
dos FreeBSD 043-backport 042-backport, |
041-backport, 035-backport |
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: teor | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by teor):
* keywords: tor-dos FreeBSD 043-backport 042-backport, 041-backport,
035-backport =>
consider-backport-after-0434, tor-dos FreeBSD 043-backport
042-backport, 041-backport, 035-backport
* status: needs_review => merge_ready
* version: 0.4.2.6 => Tor: 0.3.3.2-alpha
Comment:
Merge forward is clean, but I can't see any CI for master, so here it is:
* test master: https://github.com/torproject/tor/pull/1802
Marking for backport after 0.4.3.4, seems pretty low-risk, and pretty
important (but only for bridges with PTs).
If the test master CI passes, let's merge to master.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33491#comment:12>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs