[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #2732 [Tor Hidden Services]: Simplify hid_serv_responsible_for_desc_id
#2732: Simplify hid_serv_responsible_for_desc_id
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: rransom | Owner: rransom
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.2.x-final
Component: Tor Hidden Services | Version:
Keywords: | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by rransom):
Replying to [comment:10 nickm]:
> So based on all that discussion, what is the *right* behavior here?
Should we just always accept a hidden service descriptor regardless, or
should we add some sloppiness to the existing range test... or should we
just add some comments here and remove the is_hs_dir test from
hid_serv_acting_as_directory ?
We should remove the `is_hs_dir` test from `hid_serv_acting_as_directory`
(along with the related do-we-have-a-consensus test) for now. Adding some
sloppiness to the range test in `hid_serv_responsible_for_desc_id` would
be a Good Thing, too, but that would be tricky to get right, and
stabilizing the set of HSDir nodes is still necessary and would make
loosening the range test less important.
I don't like the idea of having all relays accept all HS descriptors --
that would make filling relays' RAM easier without a significant benefit.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2732#comment:11>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs