[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #2286 [Tor Directory Authority]: We still use self-published relay bandwidth sometimes

#2286: We still use self-published relay bandwidth sometimes
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma                     |          Owner:                    
     Type:  defect                   |         Status:  needs_review      
 Priority:  major                    |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.3.x-final
Component:  Tor Directory Authority  |        Version:                    
 Keywords:  arma-cares               |         Parent:                    
   Points:                           |   Actualpoints:                    
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment(by arma):

 Replying to [comment:24 mikeperry]:
 > Also, the way the bandwidth authorites work is to group nodes with
 similar values for the ratio (consensus_bw / descriptor_bw) for
 measurement together in 2 hop paths. So if we set this to like 50 for
 unmeasured nodes, they will currently get grouped with the slowest
 measured nodes on the network. That might be a hard sinkhole to get out
 of.

 Are you talking about the present case where we use the descriptor
 bandwidth (in which case this 50 doesn't matter), or the future case where
 you're hoping to feed back the consensus weight into the new weight?

 Even in that future case, maybe we should have a bwauth use the descriptor
 bandwidth if it has no measurement of its own yet?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2286#comment:25>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs