[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #8810 [Tor]: We need a demonstration of alternate scheduling policy capability
#8810: We need a demonstration of alternate scheduling policy capability
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: andrea | Owner: andrea
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_information
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.5.x-final
Component: Tor | Version: Tor: unspecified
Keywords: | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Changes (by karsten):
* status: needs_review => needs_information
Comment:
Here are
[https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/8810/task-8810
-alt-cmux-policy-combined.pdf results from simulating your branch and
comparing it to master]. I'd say one can observe a change between the two
branches.
The original goal of this task was: "Write a patch to make tor schedule
differently (not necessarily better, but ideally noticeable different),
simulate that, and see if we can observe a change. This step is
important, because we wanted to simulate other things in the past and then
realized our simulator cannot simulate it."
I'd say we did that. Next step will be to write more complex scheduling
algorithms and simulate them. But that's beyond this ticket.
arma, are these the results you were looking for?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8810#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs