[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-bugs] #26002 [Metrics/Statistics]: Simplify graph with number of bytes spent on answering directory requests
#26002: Simplify graph with number of bytes spent on answering directory requests
------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: karsten | Owner: metrics-team
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Metrics/Statistics | Version:
Severity: Normal | Keywords:
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: | Reviewer:
Sponsor: |
------------------------------------+--------------------------
While looking at the code that aggregates data for our
[https://metrics.torproject.org/dirbytes.html Number of bytes spent on
answering directory requests graph] I found two things:
1. In contrast to the graph description we're only including directory
traffic from directory mirrors, not from directory authorities.
2. As the graph description says, we're extrapolating whatever statistics
we get to an estimated network total; however, that formula is really
complex and not very intuitive.
I suggest we simplify this graph by a) showing traffic from all
directories (including mirrors ''and'' authorities) and b) taking out the
extrapolation step.
For what it's worth, that extrapolation step was useful in the beginning
when only few relays reported these statistics. But that was many years
ago. By now, all running tor versions support these statistics, and they
have always been turned on by default.
I'm attaching a graph that compares the current approach to the approach
suggested here. It only covers April 2018, because we don't have older
data in the database anymore. I'd have to re-import the archives for this
locally, which I'd be happy to do.
The main advantage of making this change is that our data will be easier
to specify and reproduce for others.
Setting to needs_review to get input on the question whether we should do
it. Because if there's a reason not to do it, I wouldn't start
reprocessing the archives. But currently I don't see such a reason.
Thoughts?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/26002>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs