Re: [tor-bugs] #22079 [Community]: Community governance documents

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#22079: Community governance documents
-----------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  alison     |          Owner:  alison
     Type:  project    |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium     |      Milestone:
Component:  Community  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal     |     Resolution:
 Keywords:             |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:             |         Points:
 Reviewer:             |        Sponsor:
-----------------------+------------------------

Comment (by arma):

 Replying to [comment:20 catalyst]:
 > Replying to [comment:19 atagar]:
 > > Hi Roger. Sorry, not sure I follow. I read that as saying that
 enacting new policies needs a 2/3 super majority. As you cited those had
 options to reject the policy and keep the status quo.
 > I interpret it as enacting a policy effectively requires a 2/3
 supermajority if there is only one proposal (no alternatives) and no
 abstentions.  (Abstentions seem to have the interesting effect of diluting
 reject/no-action votes.)
 >
 > For the CoC/SoV votes, I would say the "take no action" alternative was
 the "b. I do not approve of the proposal." option.  Similarly, for the
 membership policy vote, I think the "take no action" option would have
 been "B. I reject the attached proposal."

 Yep, I agree with all of this. I think we should be aware of, and maybe
 help voters be aware of too, the fact that the "no" option in these votes
 only needs 1/3 of the votes to be the winner.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/22079#comment:23>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs