[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #3786 [Tor Relay]: Make clients and bridges use their IPv6 address

#3786: Make clients and bridges use their IPv6 address
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  ln5        |          Owner:  ln5               
     Type:  task       |         Status:  needs_review      
 Priority:  normal     |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.3.x-final
Component:  Tor Relay  |        Version:                    
 Keywords:             |         Parent:  #3563             
   Points:             |   Actualpoints:                    
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------

Comment(by nickm):

 Replying to [comment:18 ln5]:
 > I've been testing this branch by connecting clients to one or two
 > bridges, IPv4 and IPv6, from a couple of different kind of systems
 > (Ubuntu, Windows, OSX, FreeBSD and NetBSD) with bridges running on
 > Ubuntu, FreeBSD and NetBSD.
 >
 > Weird things noticed include clients sticking to their IPv4 connection
 > even when the IPv6 address of a bridge with both families is
 > preferred.  Another thing is that we fail bootstrap with 404 from the
 > bridge now and again unless UseMicrodescriptors 0.
 >
 > Code is still on bug3786_2, now rebased onto master.

 Looking at the new code, I'm not finding any showstoppers.  We'll want to
 make sure the remaining known bugs all have tickets.

 The branch is kinda screwed up, though!

 92245f35bc593dad and f8687eba80cccc33 are merges from master back into the
 branch, which shouldn't be there if it's really rebased onto master.
 Moreover, lots (all?) of the patches seem to have been duplicated (??);
 like, 1e66d6b57651 and 1898c009e86531117; c7dc65c882c and
 eed5d661d463d95).  Can you figure out what went wrong there and fix that?


 Moreover, there is unrelated stuff
 (1d504759b30a6541815d9134d4f27a01fd5cea56,
 f98364cec66717aa1ebc32c2f0241e9d45681723) which I'd usually prefer to take
 separately.  Not a big deal; but I don't know why it's still there.

 (In the future, you should never give a rebased branch the same name as
 the old one.  It makes it much harder to fix stuff like this.)

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3786#comment:20>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs