[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #13773 [Tor]: Voting trouble since longclaw joined the network
#13773: Voting trouble since longclaw joined the network
---------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: Sebastian | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.6.x-final
Component: Tor | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
---------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by Sebastian):
Replying to [comment:2 nickm]:
> I think that the consensus each dirauth generates should be the one it
stores locally? If not, you could write it to a file at the end of
networkstatus_compute_consensus(). Make sure to use a different file for
each flavor.
It doesn't get stored if it isn't valid because it has just one signature,
for example I think. I'll check that, thanks for the suggestion.
> Also, is there anything suggestive in the logs?
No, that's why I opened the ticket to look more at this.
> Also, if somebody *didn't* add longclaw and remove turtles, then the
expected behavior would be that not everybody reaches the same consensus.
Have we ruled that out?
Yes, most of the time it works, the issues are spurious.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13773#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs