[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
#20511: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is
obsolete, don't do it
------------------------------+-----------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Keywords:
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: | Reviewer:
Sponsor: |
------------------------------+-----------------
http://77.247.181.162/tor/status-vote/current/consensus-microdesc
is offering me a microdesc consensus document which is {{{valid-until
2016-09-28 22:00:00}}}. Today is Oct 31.
That relay knows what time it is -- when I establish my Tor channel to it
and do a begindir fetch, it gives me good answers in the http header
responses.
Yet it is happy to give me a consensus that's a month old. And my Tor
client doesn't complain in any obvious useful way. I just get the cryptic
line:
{{{
Oct 31 23:12:29.455 [notice] I learned some more directory information,
but not enough to build a circuit: We have no recent usable consensus.
}}}
Is there a consensus age past which the correct answer for a dir cache in
that situation should be "I'm really sorry, but it's for your own good:
404"?
We wouldn't want that age to be too small, or the network would fall over
a lot faster in the case where it really has been 15 hours since the
directory authorities made a consensus.
(Also, is 404 the right return code? It isn't that I don't have it, it's
that you're not going to like it.)
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/20511>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
- Re: [tor-bugs] #20511 [Core Tor/Tor]: add a failsafe where if you're about to serve a consensus that you know is obsolete, don't do it
- From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki