[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #24158 [Core Tor/Tor]: I get this error "Looks like our kernel doesn't have the support for KIST anymore." on my relay
#24158: I get this error "Looks like our kernel doesn't have the support for KIST
anymore." on my relay
---------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: Dbryrtfbcbhgf | Owner: pastly
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor: 0.3.2.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tor-sched | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
---------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by dgoulet):
Replying to [comment:11 pastly]:
> dgoulet: can you clarify what message(s) you want to keep and which you
want to get rid of?
>
> We have
>
> `Scheduler type %s has been enabled` every time the scheduler switches
cleanly. I think we should keep this as notice.
Yes we keep this one.
>
> `Looks like our kernel doesn't have the support for KIST` every time we
try to use KIST but have to fallback to KISTLite. Should happen at most
once unless you play games with your torrc and HUPing. I think we should
keep this as notice (maybe even warn, but we don't want it to be too scary
since it may not indicate a problem).
Yes keep this one.
>
> `Scheduler type KIST has been disabled by the consensus or no kernel
support` which gets called every time we call `select_scheduler()`, have
KIST in `Schedulers`, but can't use it. I think this should be moved to
info or removed.
This one I propose we keep it notice but print _once_ and after that we do
not. However, in the case of no kernel support, this is detected at
runtime and we do log notice about it when detected so we don't need it.
Thus the only way to transition out of KIST while having KIST enabled in
Schedulers then is through the consensus. We should log notice that it
happened but only once, not everytime we get a consensus. And if we ever
transition back to KIST after a while, we'll get the "Scheduler type %s
has been enabled" so we'll be back on track.
>
> I will gladly take care of this.
Makes sense to you?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24158#comment:12>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs