[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #13296 [Tor]: Drop or replace turtles
#13296: Drop or replace turtles
------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: atagar | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.6.x-final
Component: Tor | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by micah):
Replying to [comment:8 arma]:
> Replying to [comment:7 micah]:
> I agree with the sentiment here -- but I'll also note that Micah is
referring to bandwidth authorities, which can be run next to directory
authorities but don't have to be. That is, the bwauths are just scripts
that can be run from anywhere, and they output a bwscan.V3BandwidthsFile
file that a directory authority can use to influence its votes. So
location diversity for the dir auths, and location diversity for the
bwauths, are both fine goals but they can be achieved separately.
Good point! I indeed was talking about bwauths, when this issue is about
dir auths... apologies for the mixup.
> > On another note, I think that Riseup could offer to host a DirAuth,
either in Hong Kong, possibly in Cambodia, or in Seattle.
>
> Intriguing! This idea would work best if it's run by a specific person
(or small group of persons) that we know, that have come to a few dev
meetings and met all the Tor people, etc.
It would be primarily run by me, like all the other Tor-related things
that Riseup does. Although I've never been to a dev meeting, I have met
quite a few of the Tor people.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13296#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs