[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #13135 [Onionoo]: Support various fingerprint formats
#13135: Support various fingerprint formats
-----------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: Sebastian | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Onionoo | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
-----------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by karsten):
Replying to [comment:15 Sebastian]:
> One big usecase for the partial searches is spotting some hidden service
ring cheating sybils.
Partial fingerprint searches are already supported for hex-encoded
fingerprints and will be supported for base64-encoded fingerprints, too.
Sounds like we're doing good here.
> Why I requested the base64 format is because I want to plug whatever I
see in a consensus in Tor into the tool to learn more about it. The same
goes for the reverse direction - by having them displayed on the website,
I can easily search for them on disk. I'm not sure if I ever asked for
hex-encoded digests, only fingerprints I believe.
The search part will be supported by Onionoo soon, and the display part is
something you'll have to request from Atlas/Globe people in separate
tickets. That's for relay fingerprints.
Does that mean descriptor digests are not relevant for your use cases?
That includes server descriptors, extra-info descriptors, and
microdescriptors. There was some discussion of these above, but if
fingerprints are all you care about, I'm happy not to include a feature
that wouldn't be used anyway.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13135#comment:16>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs