[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #13080 [Onionoo]: Add Ant tasks for measuring coverage, dependencies, etc. (was: Evaluate using SonarQube to improve Onionoo's code quality)

#13080: Add Ant tasks for measuring coverage, dependencies, etc.
-------------------------+-----------------
     Reporter:  karsten  |      Owner:
         Type:  task     |     Status:  new
     Priority:  normal   |  Milestone:
    Component:  Onionoo  |    Version:
   Resolution:           |   Keywords:
Actual Points:           |  Parent ID:
       Points:           |
-------------------------+-----------------

Comment (by karsten):

 Sorry for the late reply.  I agree with you that metrics on test coverage,
 dependencies, etc. are more important than code-style metrics.  I also
 agree that having one or more Ant tasks for this would be a fine start.  I
 just changed the subject to reflect that.  Would you want to write these
 Ant tasks?

 To quickly answer your questions: other Tor projects use CI, but I don't
 know much about that.  I just asked our CI person to give me an overview
 of Tor's CI or simply post on this ticket.  Once we have a better idea we
 should move this part of the discussion to its own ticket.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13080#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs