[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #13158 [Tor]: Did we ever document +/ semantics for config files?

#13158: Did we ever document +/ semantics for config files?
---------------------------+--------------------------------
     Reporter:  Sebastian  |      Owner:
         Type:  defect     |     Status:  new
     Priority:  normal     |  Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.5.x-final
    Component:  Tor        |    Version:
   Resolution:             |   Keywords:
Actual Points:             |  Parent ID:
       Points:             |
---------------------------+--------------------------------

Comment (by arma):

 https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/blob/refs/tags/tor-0.2.4.17-rc:/ChangeLog#l3234
 is the best I've found.

 Putting some of that into the man page would probably be wise. I only ran
 across it while trying to fix #12948.

 Also, I admit that I'm not really sold on this new syntax -- so I've been
 trying to avoid situations where ordinary users actually need to use it or
 know about it.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13158#comment:1>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs