Re: [tor-dev] Remote anonymous browsing

[Matthew Finkel <matthew.finkel@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:04:52AM +0530, mahesh wrote:
> Hi, I am a third year undergraduate student of Information Technology at 
> PICT, Pune, India. I'm dying to contribute to tor community as I use it 
> a lot. There's an opportunity for me in GSOC-2013. I read tor's idea 
> page and came to know that would have to contribute to existing project. 
> But, I would like to propose a new project. I came across this problem 
> statement from a friend of mine who is journalist. He says, most of the 
> times he don't have his laptop with him so he cant access tor from a 
> CyberCafe as they won't let him download the bundle. So, I propose that 
> there should be a web server to handle tor requests over http. I did my 
> study and think its feasible but let me know everyone else's thought on it.
> 
> Mahesh

I think this is an interesting idea (will have to read the paper Paul
linked to see what conclusions were already formulated), but there are
a number of ways to look at this.

(These are possibly flawed/have holes in them, so please plug them)

1) We don't know the threat model going into this discussion, so "what
could go wrong?". That being said,

2) I think it may have its purpose (and there is a threat model that
supports this), the example already mentioned being one of them
(with some assumptions). Without special treatment, the connection
basically turns into a nondeterministic four-hop proxy (well, the last
three hops are nondeterministic).

3) As was mentioned, this will be just one additional avenue where end users
may be confused about the protection actually provided to them. There
have been numerous discussion about Tor2Web on IRC and how users have been
confused by the urls (there have likely been discussions elsewhere, as
well) and I would say that this idea actually takes Tor2Web one step further
(about four hops further, actually) such that it allows access to
hidden services and the internet (with all of the advantages and
disadvantages).

4) Who do you trust? With this remote-proxy, it really depends on what
you're looking to gain from using the Tor network. Are you looking for a
censorship circumvention tool? Then you probably don't want to use a
remote-proxy node run by the censorer or any of it's allies. If you're
looking to remain anonymous...well, anonymous with respect to whom,
I suppose?

Again, I don't think this idea is too far fetched (I'm not sure as to
the size of this project and its appropriateness for GSoC) but this
will add just one more item to the list of tools about which end users will
need to be educated. Remember, in general, the easier something is to
use, the less secure it it. However, on the flip side, the more users using
Tor, the more traffic on the network and therefore the harder it will be
to "de-anonymize" a user (for some definition of that).

Hopefully I'm not too far off-base with this assessment.

All the best,

Matt
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev