Gunes Acar: > Sorry everyone for the long pause. > > I wrote down a proposal (and some code) to address issues raised by > Mike and George: > https://securehomes.esat.kuleuven.be/~gacar/summer_2014.pdf > > Looking for your comments and critics... I am happy with getting 1), 2) and 3) done in that order but am a bit wondering why that does not match your suggestion in the timeline. There you plan doing something like 2) (+ maybe the "Implement fingerprinting tests" from 1)), 3) and 1). Is there a reason for this? I am asking as porting the Panopticlick and getting something live to use seems to be the most tricky part of your proposal (I might be wrong here, though). Having this as the last item to work on contains the nonnegligible risk that it won't get finished which would we sad... > On 03/21/2014 11:39 PM, Peter Eckersley wrote: >> I think we're fine with open sourcing under the Affero GPLv3. Wow. I almost missed that one in all the quoted emails and it did not make it to tor-dev. But good to hear that we have something to build upon. Thanks, Peter. Georg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev