[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal draft: The move to a single guard node

To: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal draft: The move to a single guard node
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:20:37 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:20:51 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=EnqnRrrqvGbFesAUMKpzy4F96C/seItjqlJND1UgDHY=; b=zDMlu6UbgD67WwKNMVp+zqmxBvDAEgudTMsqG7FHtoB7q1yFUswW2yH5QTwL/GJEPt KBm6ynxMeCKLoAMlLxUeDZwCpNrnfsh2cG6blvT6JFE5OrvkQ5ve9dYDI1tCCLU3hN/V 3Cai9dmxPEVZ702QhdLCqxV1sj8UPK6oEJf3IQgfDbhHGvoDIKzDTcpYWMZkyNuWSRdb RYRWps7BXtOpqQG6+ORQJNZRGdZAyPbjzQqlwS2Wo/2Nb3BfSdQFufTRfSRajMxraIVS 5ESnK2T280EcXFsNjMEgijO2WQGG2wih8kdRJBvaQN3Q/xZ8h0abkvDaKVIPA4LuR77W cGYQ==
In-reply-to: <CA+CHzS_DAa_ceGa2Sj6HOS3BOhGyn_Tjfm8OQv9FYdGVY1-5VA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: discussion regarding Tor development <tor-dev.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-dev@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <87y4zc3uha.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+CHzS_-wsQFdWGsS=b++BUvA=6cggDb=f5jxLH7i3bWCXFPxw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87lhv6vn9l.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+CHzS_DAa_ceGa2Sj6HOS3BOhGyn_Tjfm8OQv9FYdGVY1-5VA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-dev" <tor-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Nicholas Hopper <hopper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:35 AM, George Kadianakis <desnacked@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> A patch for the proposal would be useful. If you don't have time to do
>> it, just tell me and I will do it myself.
>
> Here's a patch:
> https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~hopper/single-guard-node.patch

The proposal as patched is now proposal # 236.

yrs,
-- 
Nick
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

References:
- [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal draft: The move to a single guard node
  - From: George Kadianakis
- Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal draft: The move to a single guard node
  - From: Nicholas Hopper
- Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal draft: The move to a single guard node
  - From: George Kadianakis
- Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal draft: The move to a single guard node
  - From: Nicholas Hopper

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-dev] [tor-talk] heartbleed: ETA for tor release(s) that blacklist affected directory authority keys? (#11464)
Next by Author: Re: [tor-dev] Panopticlick summer project
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal draft: The move to a single guard node
Next by thread: Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal draft: The move to a single guard node
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread