Re: [tor-dev] A few ideas about improved design/modularity in Tor

[meejah <meejah@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ZeroMQ and its competitors are pretty good, but overkill.  They're
> designed to work in a distributed environment where with unreliable
> network connections, whereas for this application I'm only thinking
> about splitting a single Tor instance across multiple processes on the
> same host.

ZeroMQ has an "INPROC" transport that works for inter-thread
communication (and it's way faster than the networked ones, even
unix-sockets, at least a few years back when I benchmarked some things
involving ZeroMQ in C++).

-- 
meejah
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev