On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 02:48:45AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > It's suggested and welcome that all overlay networks publicly > review, audit, analyze, each others work and offerings. Unfortunately > that hasn't develop much yet in a formal dedicated as responsibility > manner among even the larger opensource community, or even > discussion if that is a good idea. (But there is some good work in > some projects out there lately of their own work... automated code > linting, and the rarer procured third party audit.) > > Then shall we presume all our networks are equivalently secure?, > or equivalently flawed, as each network happens to advertise now and then. Makes sense. > This may leave the matter of partitioning up to the user to consider > pursuant to any note about that in the app documentation. I agree. Giving power of choice to the users is ideal. > The app could enable simultaneous multihome based on commandline > options... --tor --i2p --cjdns --other, default [whatever] . > And of course all the ports / addresses / bindings would need to > be flexible. > > On equivalent networks, presence is maybe a bigger issue than partitioning. > This includes concept to drop the network identity off the network itself, > or use new ID, not just managing announces to buddy list entries. Interesting! I opened an issue [0] to discuss this feature (copied your post there). It might take a while to work on that as we have other tasks with a higher priority, but I intend to get back to it at some point. Thanks, -Felipe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev