On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:13:45 -0700 Robert Ransom <rransom.8774@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:56:08 -0400 > Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Ian Goldberg <iang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > > >> They look like Tor version numbers, for whatever Tor version merges > > >> the patch that implements this, and later. > > > > > > No, I mean that if someone writes a totally different implementation of > > > the Tor server (say in some other language like Java or Haskell), how > > > will the client be able to tell whether that implementation supports > > > this feature? > > > > We have no really good solution for this in general. It would be neat > > to work one out, but that's probably a separate proposal. :) > > Add a relay descriptor line: > > bugfixes trac1795,fs12345,bz9876 On second thought, a âproposalsâ line would be more appropriate. (Other implementations would have their own bugs and bug trackers.) Robert Ransom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature