Re: [tor-dev] an alternate MyFamily definition

[tagnaq <tagnaq@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

> True, but: If one relay disappears for a while then the family may 
> break into two if it was the only joint.

For the family (see #6662):
3cce3a91f6a625~8DE5 bc1245cbe16d5ee9b2~2D25

the connecting relay was down since 2012-04-04 and still karsten
created the family in this case, but I'm not sure if karsten used more
descriptors as would usually be available to an ordinary tor client.

https://metrics.torproject.org/relay-search.html?search=%24A0EA6A3D1B4D30F5005E89501DB68D4E14A0E183+2012-04











one more example:

A: B, C, E   (A is the connecting central node)
B: A
C: A
D: A, B, C, D
E: A

family = A, B, C, E


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF4EAREKAAYFAlA2jskACgkQyM26BSNOM7aoqwD+JossIuqs3Zps9NYLF/lrK2XS
DG7CaenEFNdsWN9mwVEA/3I3uH6YAiN2MMVR7od5yUAcgDYssmg5tlFm6lQfyJk5
=Z7DY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev