[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: All Relays are Directory Servers


On 19 Aug 2014, at 22:00 , tor-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 01:32:25 +0000
From: Matthew Finkel <matthew.finkel@xxxxxxxxx>
To: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: All Relays are Directory Servers
Message-ID: <20140819013224.GB3689@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:17:28PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Matthew Finkel
<matthew.finkel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Filename: xxx-directory-servers-for-all.txt
Title: All relays are directory servers
Author: Matthew Finkel
Created: 29-Jul-2014
Status:
Target: 0.2.6.x

Overview:

   This proposal aims at removing part of the distinction between the
relay and the directory server. Currently operators have the options
of being one of: a relay, a directory server, or both.  With the
acceptance of this proposal the options will be simplified to being
either only a directory server or a combined relay and directory
server. All relays will serve directory requests.

FWIW, we don't support being only a directory server right now, do we?


Nope, you're right. Bad assumption.

https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/blob/390728d85644a6c062d6807ffc096343d1c1e73e:/src/or/config.c#l2565

Looking at the details of parse_ports(), the warning/comment isn't entirely accurate: it seems that any configured "port" is enough to disable the warning (even a DirPort, ControlPort/ControlSocket(!), or ExtORPort).
Which is why I'm not seeing it on the directory-only tor instance I have configured.

Then again, the core message is accurate - a tor instance that doesn't act as a tor client or relay isn't going to do much.

Tim


_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev