[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Multiplexing alternatives to poll()...

To: or-dev@freehaven.net
Subject: Multiplexing alternatives to poll()...
From: Bruce Montrose <montrose@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:32:03 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:30:38 -0500
In-reply-to: <200212171713.MAA19198@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Reply-to: or-dev@freehaven.net
Sender: owner-or-dev@freehaven.net

Read this article comparing the various multiplexing techniques... http://www.kegel.com/dkftpbench/Poller_bench.html

It would seem that either /dev/poll or kqueue could drastically improve our multiplexing in the onion router.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multiplexing alternatives to poll()...
  - From: Steven Hazel <sah@thalassocracy.org>
- Re: Multiplexing alternatives to poll()...
  - From: Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>

References:
- Re: problems with the aci range too small?
  - From: Paul Syverson <syverson@itd.nrl.navy.mil>

Prev by Date: Re: problems with the aci range too small?
Next by Date: Re: Multiplexing alternatives to poll()...
Previous by thread: Re: problems with the aci range too small?
Next by thread: Re: Multiplexing alternatives to poll()...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread