Re: [tor-dev] exit-node block bypassing

[Ximin Luo <infinity0@xxxxxxx>]

On 31/12/13 12:35, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2013-12-31 12:07, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Flashproxy[1] helps to bypass entry-node blocks. But we could apply
>> the general idea to exit-nodes as well - have the exit-node connect
>> to the destination via an ephemeral proxy.
> 
> If an exit node is blocked towards a certain site, that exit node should
> define a policy stating that it is blocked by that destination.
> (DirAuths could maybe be made to add extra details like that?)
> 
> If an exit node is useless it is a bad exit and should not be used at
> all, that is, shutdown.
> 

This is an unrelated topic from my original post. I am asking whether trying to implement an anti-exit-node-blocking-system would be A Good Thing To Do.

> 
> For your 'flashproxy' case, it would just mean 'moving' the exit node to
> the new exit IP btw. You would thus only be shifting the problem.
> 

Those new IPs are ephemeral and unpredictable, therefore not feasible to block. See the flashproxy page on how it works; a few tweaks are needed to make it work for exits, but it's fairly straightforward to do so.

But this is also an unrelated topic. I am less interested in getting it to technically work (because I am convinced it *will* work), but rather on whether it is a good idea or not.

-- 
GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE
git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev