[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPV6 address support on exit nodes
- To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: IPV6 address support on exit nodes
- From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:28:47 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:28:54 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CSd0BeGcKjVZK6Qo9Wg8nglQUVO1uMVjDi+Au7DSgtY=; b=YQ6XP7zOQAVyNTb9KwWIlPwn3kiHUfDg5ga2QWsrkvZOae6RcD7FS68ePqmkpzgMwT mLdkLwGmjWpCqiDatK/dimP2pBZooOgc7YKFohX8lDh6XWHI0hK6wrQeFeopob2OcCQ1 4MXQ1JNHbLw8Alnn5lsfX2Nzey9E1QFlmtzQM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=pmChdS/06BK4BcsnJhihuCLK0hDx6b28P0Hfu9APhIx1m9FZIaamYvE/zsB9g4g2Eq PF0UyRNap56bVJLGDZkqjZc+fGApO7Lj5NxRPy4EcypqcvvE1ENiA/P4xS9mk8u8zwjn +NUtu7Y8snwXwxhlx9Z/Dvswe+mqhTbzUMdxk=
- In-reply-to: <4D4E74CE.7030605@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <AANLkTikatRGdvOE_Z_bhcZMTZvNYcp15YW1RVrj6Kgy6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4E74CE.7030605@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> Hopefully I will be able to invest a bit more time on this work in the
> coming week and come up with a beta patch for other people to try and
> then join my test network so that it can all be tested on a larger
> scale. (The test network is not using the real tor network and thus
> changes to the code work without affecting the live network ;)
> Work is busy though, thus that is holding me off for a bit.
Neat! I am looking forward to seeing your code and spec changes. (Do
you have spec changes here, or are you just "winging it"
protocolwise?) Even if you don't have a chance to finish soon, it
might be a good idea (depending on the state of stuff) to use your
patches as a starting-off point rather than trying to implement IPv6
from scratch.
peace,
--
Nick Mathewson