Re: [tor-dev] Running doctor's sybil checker over archived consensuses

[grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Philipp Winter <phw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:11:25PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
>> FYI, between here there was thread tor-talk 'many new relays' of possible
>> event around end 2009-06 to begining 2009-07. Along with usual posts
>> of people about potential things to detect.
>
> Interesting, thanks for pointing this out.  This event is visible in
> the diagram but not as a sudden spike but more as a temporary increase
> in the base rate:
> <http://www.nymity.ch/new_fingerprints/2009_new_fingerprints.png>

Cool, nice to see this graphed, really obvious something happened.

> This event also shows why a simple threshold-based detection mechanism
> is insufficient: Sybils can be added slowly over several hours or days
> in order to stay under the threshold.

Re detection methods, consider some examination of exceeded bounds
within first and second derivatives of various data you are
collection, RRD, etc.
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev