Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh

[Karsten Loesing <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/01/16 05:38, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Hi Karsten, implemented Stem counterparts of these (see attached).
> On one hand the code is delightfully simple, but on the other 
> measurements I got were quite a bit slower. Curious to see what
> you get when running at the same place you took your measurements.

Cool!  Here's a comparison between metrics-lib and Stem run on the
same system:

server-descriptors-2015-11.tar:
 - metrics-lib: 0.285430 ms
 - Stem: 1.02 ms (357%)

extra-infos-2015-11.tar:
 - metrics-lib: 0.215500 ms
 - Stem: 0.68 ms (316%)

consensuses-2015-11.tar:
 - metrics-lib: 246.713092 ms
 - Stem: 1393.10 ms (565%)

microdescs-2015-11.tar:
 - metrics-lib: 0.066566 ms
 - Stem: 0.66 ms (991%)

Do these Stem results look plausible?

Philipp, would you be able to write the Zoossh counterpart for the
descriptor types supported by it?  I'm even more curious now how those
numbers compare to metrics-lib and Stem.

All the best,
Karsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWlLwCAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCr9y0H/i43rgx14dJXxxzUOnFLgUpm
THfWdWoWZQo1P5mQx5WZctUAjk1OBTGUX+EyVZzwOoLjaZHKXX8Nu14et1kz0CSM
K1qs0bDALgwXpVg5Rm79kIUanm0hcptWAlKkyqAu1X2Qfu/2fVKfCEvrDZJlVoCC
ePuMLLxvRim0fBT4K1aRKRdxwob4HKv90N+4Ib+Llw0CLy8DQFJjKKDpmruxxcuq
62KzWz2Ck2AiJUPr2BYMxFMozyE40lQ38RcP6rbomF2PxqxP2W5pjs9R0jfzcRA5
o28okykuFqaIp82rnuvmUXbYrYvPV/2GAqrsKAj+rHon/xeGDWsYZG/FOzIhZsU=
=soLz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev