Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal for the encoding of prop224 onion addresses

[segfault <segfault@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi George,

George Kadianakis:
[...]
> [D3] Do we like base32???
> 
>       In this proposal I suggest we keep the base32 encoding since we've been
>       using it for a while; but this is the perfect time to switch if we feel
>       the need to.
> 
>       For example, Bitcoin is using base58 which is much more compact than
>       base32, and also has much better UX properties than base64:
>          https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Base58Check_encoding#Background
> 
>       If we wanted to get a more compact encoding, we could adopt base58 or
>       make our own adaptation of it. In this proposal I'm using base32 for
>       everything, but I could be persuaded that now is the time to use a better
>       encoding.
While the addresses are definitely too long to be fun to type, there are
still use cases where the addresses will be typed. So I think we should
consider everything which would make them easier to type and compare. 
Like others stated, base58 will not make the addresses easier to type, 
because they would be case sensitive.

But maybe it would help to separate them into groups of 4 characters,
separated maybe by a dash, which would make them look like this:

    tbi5-tdxb-osio-tpha-wjyu-7f5p-w5tl-nvbv-fjrj-7mes-kbsn-wr2b-qbu2-t4gg.onion


Cheers
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev