Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Directory structure of prop224 onion services

[meejah <meejah@xxxxxxxxx>]

David Goulet <dgoulet@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I don't believe we should suffix here because for almost 10 years, users/apps
> have been exposed to "hostname" and it does make sense that it's the goto file
> for that.

I'm +1 on keeping the filename as "hostname".

txtorcon doesn't do processing on it, per se.

Might be worth noting here that it's not always "a" hostname: if you
have an authenticated hidden-service, it is multiple lines. In "basic"
auth case, each line starts with the same .onion address -- in "stealth"
case, each line has its own .onion address.

cheers,

-- 
meejah

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev