Norman Danner <ndanner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Based on a quick look, it seems like Cyclone provides a slightly
nicer way to specify how to handle the various requests than does a
plain Twisted web application. Are there any other advantages to
using Cyclone as opposed to plain Twisted?
From what I understand of the two systems, Twisted's "web stuff" isn't
really intended as a "web application framework" (yet?) and you'd
probably want Nevow or Twisted.web2 for that anyway. Cyclone and
Tornado, OTOH, *are* Web frameworks. The advantage of Cyclone being
that it's based on the core Twisted async "stuff" rather than
Tornado's homebrew (and hence supports more things, has tests,
cross-platform support, etcetera).
Using Cyclone would also allow you to use txtorcon, as it's based on
Twisted too :)