[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] prop224: Ditching key blinding for shorter onion addresses

To: George Kadianakis <desnacked@xxxxxxxxxx>, tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] prop224: Ditching key blinding for shorter onion addresses
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 13:00:35 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 13:00:51 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=HgsPVvKtG7dpLIttKlu5XIP8MsfdNviCGzaFACslRTQ=; b=pZgr8jrLtsnLknqLlxVJws/VgeFufhV/JnZGWc6SYavIIJqVKBhvUnJcI1pNtWkTy8 x1bPU1ZXq48M2srdTiacZCtBp7HrvyCMHaSQ1SpDgyySbtfGg7fwQ0jlv3OxEFu6ELVf 2zhxQeu0LqSj3M8Y1Z/R8mErjXTf/W1b9ECuaFH9bhQ6ERsl7Lg+vlDxCNmiwTPwjD7l ZLg68P/c9oGV5fuMyxl3Za5y8sTmkY7DJci7eiOLl3u3CaImgM0TzWskz2X7ycnOWj+3 FPJVXvWGiQkl5q5cW46Kug2JLQPxN8bFkF80QJ5WpTe4zjgUkBBe+wGupPhR+SDIGUx/ zEqw==
In-reply-to: <CAKDKvuyJs=ZGL9_nvkbeAZ__w3D24ztprWYegzp0XDOH=6o-hg@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: discussion regarding Tor development <tor-dev.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-dev@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <87oa5g5utt.fsf@riseup.net> <CAKDKvuyoQgMCO539H4eoEDXWWyWZHsWLTMLq1j_E=1HhT-vraQ@mail.gmail.com> <87oa5fuu8n.fsf@riseup.net> <CAKDKvuyJs=ZGL9_nvkbeAZ__w3D24ztprWYegzp0XDOH=6o-hg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-dev" <tor-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

whoops, didn't reply-all.

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 9:32 AM, George Kadianakis <desnacked@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  [...]
>>
>> Please let me know in what way this scheme is completely broken!
>
> I think it has the same problem as the last one: there does not appear
> to be a way to keep an attacker from putting their own record in place
> using your query_key, and thereby performing a DoS on your hidden
> service.
>
>
> --
> Nick
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

References:
- [tor-dev] prop224: Ditching key blinding for shorter onion addresses
  - From: George Kadianakis
- Re: [tor-dev] prop224: Ditching key blinding for shorter onion addresses
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: [tor-dev] prop224: Ditching key blinding for shorter onion addresses
  - From: George Kadianakis

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-dev] tor-dev Digest, Vol 66, Issue 17
Next by Author: Re: [tor-dev] [network-team] [doodle poll] Meeting to discuss guard proposal draft status
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-dev] prop224: Ditching key blinding for shorter onion addresses
Next by thread: Re: [tor-dev] prop224: Ditching key blinding for shorter onion addresses
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread