[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Padding
> OR -> OR links: I propose we leave the n^2 padding for now. Though we have
> this idea that each OR may only need to be connected to a few OR's
> (statically) and this would give the same anonymity as being connected to
> all of them, but then the OP's need to know which OR's are connected to
> which to choose valid routes. Any opinions on this?
I did a bad thing here. This is George Danezis' idea and I forgot that he
had asked me not to mention it to people when we discussed it. He is
analysing this and will tell us if the idea is sound.
A.
------------------
Andrei Serjantov
Queens' College
Cambridge CB3 9ET
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~aas23/
- References:
- Padding
- From: Andrei Serjantov <aas23@hermes.cam.ac.uk>