On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:58:05PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Geoffrey Goodell wrote: > > > Suggest that instead of removing routers that are not running, we simply > > remove routers for which we do not have descriptors in dir/server/all. > > Does this make sense? > > No, what good would that do? The goal here is to make the consensus > document smaller. This would make the consensus document smaller -- I am not sure why the consensus document includes routers that are not in dir/server/all, but last I checked it did. This fact bothers me more than the fact that some of the routers are not Running.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature