[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: IOCP / C10K
- To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: IOCP / C10K
- From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:27:00 -0800
- Cc: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-dev@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:27:10 -0500
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZHFMO1kChRrOzxe6qgsfoRsXugAWTVnCOewQpkdVUuVk3Zt2ZPUQMz9Gqlztr0OE8rOO4jKl7FNz1pe2AisBoNPZGnG3eExJNtwG/lSBe+y/g5OUcjNbLgE/5P1fgGZa1ulb/BMvj///JH30sDovmHTcsaUiiEYv1CORSDD4Dc4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eadFZ9jHN1X4PwbEkeJCFgPU8uSYMi81x5ybFxKIPs8YWkCXcDtB56e557V30z/j8xpzOEw3D97kCwFb1vzi/L2SHkPsrD4lgIpIj1uvNSd7HAAPrluLuM6d7ZlSFYglN3IJLabjbYUpLeVzUzzqBuhK0HS22LRTJVvi03uK9C4=
- In-reply-to: <54198.82.195.181.130.1173263863.squirrel@webmail.serve.com>
- References: <54198.82.195.181.130.1173263863.squirrel@webmail.serve.com>
- Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 3/7/07, Toby Douglass <toby.douglass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've written a C10K solution for Windows, libiocp.
...
It is useful in its current form?
this is useful for libevent. unfortunately i am not volunteering a patch :)
note that even with overlapped i/o or completion ports many xp/2k
kernels max out buffer resources at 5k or so open sockets (sometimes
much less (or server variants much more)).
but still, that's much more useful than the select like variant
available for compatibility.