On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:47:24AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote: > > Ok. I think we're all happy to accept this proposal -- Nick, can > > you check it into the proposals section and integrate this thread > > into a 'decisions' section or something? > > In the mean time, I've implemented it: > http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/Mar-2007/msg00086.html Great. I checked in, updated and closed proposal 107 (since you implemented it and merged it into the spec): http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/107-uptime-sanity-checking.txt I also added a new proposal 108 with the MTBF idea: http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/108-mtbf-based-stability.txt (It was at http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/108-mtbf-based-uptime.txt for a bit; try that URL if the new one doesn't work yet.) It's got a couple of implementation/definition questions at the end that I'm hoping somebody can come up with an answer for. peace, -- Nick Mathewson
Attachment:
pgpKTkx4vi62l.pgp
Description: PGP signature