[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 301: Don't include package fingerprints in consensus documents



Hi,

>> On 25/02/2019 23:30, teor wrote:
>>> Looks good to me, let's merge it as an "accepted" proposal?

This is now proposal 301.

What is the process by which this becomes "accepted"? Is this just a
matter of someone making that commit?

Thanks,
Iain.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev