[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ustaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 07:13:58AM -0400, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> The directory authorities should probably checks the B's anyway, just to
> be sane. They should all have order exactly p_1, so check that
> EXP(B,8) is not O, and check that EXP(B,p_1) is O.
While we're talking about this, note that our paper says that the CA
(the directory authority here) should check that the node submitting B
actually does know b (the private key). This could be as simple as the
standard Fiat-Shamir NIZKPK.
- Ian
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
- References:
- [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ostaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
- Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ostaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
- Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ostaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
- Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ostaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
- Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ostaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
- Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ostaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
- Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ostaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
- Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ustaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
- Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ustaoglu with proposed circuit handshake
- Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ustaoglu with proposed circuit handshake