[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Tor bandwidth measurements document format
- To: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Tor bandwidth measurements document format
- From: juga <juga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 08:34:00 +0000
- Autocrypt: addr=juga@xxxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsFNBFONpUkBEADCZKJs2sXSK2qEvIquZKnt16LCsg61kacKX9MGdbrfB/xxrjx9tcU6fCFd C5//4OwI+sT/E41LrwpV8cehVtoAtmwyUK+/LC3XLbK8m8XSp8/ghOBnm2jlI0z9FVqfHuiv cfd6v7C2xSkqu2TvzdavBetHgPtJwrZ1zK5suQY4ww+48C2GvyqwJR1CMjJq2mz5CEa3mh7N vwqnSxM8Oh1ptSiRbkGR36GF5rt2w2fbFv143fqvquNi+T0P/VWjFk7DZA4d6yhiiM3zb3IL I3TOlgZT2oyjAqq5DTU5evS1VYq9zugT5xvvFQ473M2le3uSr5wPhj4kXkDAgbaHOxinBfR4 ldT3yDJ63mDq1nxxhBfoDx6EP/8gard04aow1zFw8USUS18wloV5/XMnGZX4vYFpKfPYxOSw CFyXXPxGkeIqZ7A1kuUJnvnsfFs+FzPor0EkaKHV88HB/XFwupgc1h4EhmDcEAQJGh8wgjrN A/xLH6tiv08VSC6wtS1BfOQsaRoA32/rQAusoZ5uzwk1C4WJlJ6RkBf/XWIFt9T+22gl8rAP 6MGTFGzq1Wnvfp54ih16+B3tyrH1rjfo2TSHzJypdOJElhjxi2RxLGD3UBOrmjm2nxqWYEE/ syQRWaTs7UTXQ83veLs0exIKzr31nUHuYIqkCITPHVTywHJ4FwARAQABzRIgPGp1Z2FAcmlz ZXVwLm5ldD7CwZcEEwEKAEECGwMFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgMCAQACHgECF4ACGQEWIQQtqB0B RVw6ADIZiFDzBUR6+AbUawUCWT+5lAUJB5NHywAKCRDzBUR6+AbUa29FEACTIHcWwDSMacME vYiFBcXPYeA+vHvg8Tn0D/utUsVimmwSZTai9pyFXo7cvAZV99VgWgqv8hGg4YqGu/NJdnCD VMeJt/y9zE7qvfqpI9vxOr6BNzhbg0ww61oPqSvyfb68muFiwMvfl7my3pkYqoHlngfcjoMI qZuhxG/UHl2jNIYYlRIhA3mR1lCp2BmZjKUcWlTPN70WDWTfRjjnGLFgi6ce5uM7egxFPo5c 69t4t8mRVFkBN58sdfwfQ1FWZLlAw6yc8NIkj3/mHPHnH1ihBbAGWRB66wlfm5ZCrFxdOxg8 43KHXf92d5rgvs1R4ap2NzibMJL/Hlty0cDgvvhBDeJ87EPikMOl5GT1kqQKRPLdrz0J2rus y8UFIlFot//ekhmxFZp3MnKxzG6xs+Ok3D5tbHCyS+c4WMIjDTaNFUMRxzjXy9mIneQ7DSDV wsEtiftl6SKdRulLjIDhUwEIXZvoeYLThhd/dsYTth+6RAfi88eUqGnjYI3YkfAw65lz9AwN PoyUXoSVeANEhad/GbpnfBGA/o4cntQNk5jS5nQdPwSTLqZCKGGOuHW1UKpHz8A8wrrt36gl GihSJuKhtpsQYKv+7SUBnrXkHzBtspLH7MK9Svf3IZFOgUzIHtKAOVsVFhEfClq5LGz8cpfB 3qyv5EhQ1QRpFOiN4c3Ays7BTQRTjaaBARAA5UBd7mTMdO/6wXKSfeJef5Wwtuc8Js4zdZOM uZ15Kkqk5P3wALqUVzrSsdDv4vO2M79ZranbHWcdAOApkRiRJ0Yu/fzUdgyBBf6v4KI98sZD LRdz/I+7994sAgB839dd+hTKQDuG7rArKxD3PWYLkaWRkOX/rPJUJ2l5xeF69kSrtyANfXPs mvZjzDBBvxegelYAGroDHXUJjgMSXPIz3nLVwQtJTMszs7tyOW+/Nhb6+SPilzahGWWd39Cs wbo0CoKu/AjAcdeNbcS3ab4fNy/yARq2EXFB5+vTSkAolDoDBriGqGpCDgvoFPz7lb7/IGld jsO8MQddlztu38X/Md3fGu4Cje/IchqfNb8eikztVxyVImtc1MXUWs4Ecc2t5FYmVzlTXppI tA/rpM9D4w/QEnyptQ7Uu8aItTOmy3NEHUGR/pWH2J0M78zrAg1FP6Dso4ANRVM2wTsQbeys 8e0NHocGUI64MS/2Xqmkd+bEdFY8RdoNzakUcai1VnDobYMbp9c37K+WjeBVsru5JqEkjzfv u8Zk7Ji0f4EyZ4ng+JlMsldytE5LCO0nEduJYCWpa3FtuEy7P9zK0kThq6ED3I3b2JtboADt c0I1tpZto8A21JN60ULUJbyGA/UqZFAqJu8qBUI8nrqAm/5nyv/e6axeZl3vJfmGcskHqI0A EQEAAcLBfAQYAQoAJgIbDBYhBC2oHQFFXDoAMhmIUPMFRHr4BtRrBQJZP7mkBQkHk0ajAAoJ EPMFRHr4BtRrppIP/3DS3og9FiY3VB7a1LLbthGEj3e/ORrPxpQicwSB/Rn70KsrVtB5AYaH bcD64yJCxHLaxKOXNoLtNvAqUHGiJxCN9QNElRlQG+DsuglsUSPAAjgGbGueaB6VFoGv5QZY xkc3K7t7K/Q0V87wUZmxFPAGZK5KMud8Zy93s+U9i2bdXEQsANGb4ubT7rfYGU0TGio+zRMY 1vEokRMz87hyM4laFwwa2X+JrcSl0Ghg382IDJG6lK2DsVU5M1TkqBC0/vmnfOx+/OFuMsWo dCB/vmOEiuH4xM5/c856OPsPz0SYhlGfLqrpr51lp2tAG19JuZCQ/uPZqt0KYuebk0nhnOS8 PFujQiYhSebXyLfcUBXUEu0BMqjWPE0Yumk/2zluq10t4xZDjGvifcH/1AzxPlH6ezxote8H OjiL+pOYSqbHoEGFNX95wMinU7niq75r1ikonsMKKgQDP1Tl06TKenwH6Muci/FX9Q2YhHJ1 uEODG0kFr/LqIFMdj9mUtAH20p1weyhGG+X6BUIjc96XTbaLms43qT0RI/cil1PQBrRzS2S0 OjT6j+g5WkKOS17MEFnar7lOcQvxD62hSuD4HKZ1WL0ocExRxReSFfjFXWaibHNyhNynR4pQ FNMJrVJl5qqdXi9u89gq5wSWTb3t5V00CsPP0e0jBSgh6jT5xUil
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 02 May 2018 04:34:39 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1525250062; bh=ue46fFrfJWyAqyvvebtDgkLLHxfycVFsMbzFKI0j9c0=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ddvqo/3l5i+Ld6ULsAUXbLquBZyp5SeBOjPAe/iOnSI5F9W1CIQu4ctQRWZHosWhV mFrHE9z0mYMANv38YBRye7ugDwLsv/cIsqoDgzjoutHJmBGbyx0ZPwaiPrMAHEGk8D 8z5WNtaTh5pG46yTRhlBxzxqEYjpfee7t7VjIOe8=
- In-reply-to: <5c2bfe0f-e519-1f4b-5ef1-a2c92808e5b2@torproject.org>
- List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/>
- List-help: <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
- List-id: discussion regarding Tor development <tor-dev.lists.torproject.org>
- List-post: <mailto:tor-dev@lists.torproject.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
- References: <af2221c5-a4b6-44ab-865d-19c4fd8013ae@riseup.net> <2308e29a-752d-b6c6-c8dc-ad754a2f6887@riseup.net> <CAKDKvuyXai2514313ufAUu8+qKZcv0SaVGttWNMFQ6U6YrtXnA@mail.gmail.com> <5c2bfe0f-e519-1f4b-5ef1-a2c92808e5b2@torproject.org>
- Reply-to: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: "tor-dev" <tor-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Iain,
Iain Learmonth:
> Hi,
>
>> Tor Bandwidth Measurements Document Format
>
> "Measurement" could mean a method for performing a measurement, a single
> measurement task, a schedule for a repeating measurement task, a
> measurement result or a few other things.
I also wondered whether that was the correct word and considered
"capacity", but didn't convince me.
Teor also suggested me to remove "Document", but i thought i'd keep it,
trying to mean that the spec is only about the "file" and not the
process or how they are formatted somewhere else.
Do you have a suggestion on what other word to use instead of measurements?.
> When Large MeAsurement Platforms (LMAP) wrote documents in the IETF,
> they only ever used measurement as an adjective to avoid any ambiguity.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-eardley-lmap-terminology-02.txt
>
> The architecture for LMAP may not fit well with the bandwidth scanner
> architecture, and so I'm not suggesting we adopt the terminology in that
> document throughout.
>
>>> 2. Format details
>>>
>>> Bandwidth measurements MUST contain the following > sections:
>>> - Header (exactly once)
>>> - Relays measurements (zero or more times)
>>
>> Grammar suggestion: "Relay measurements".
>
> In this case, this would become "Relay measurement result".
More accurate, though starts becoming a bit too long. The title should
probably become then: "Tor Bandwidth Measurements Results Document Format"
Any shorter suggestion?.
> If desirable, I'd be happy to check through the document for any other
> places ambiguities pop up, but I'll let others finish having their
> comments integrated first.
It's fine to continue to make comments on the thread where others
commented, no need to wait until those comments are integrated. But
either way works.
Thanks for your comments!,
juga.
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev