[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thoughts on changing our package names

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Thoughts on changing our package names
From: andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:10:11 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:10:12 -0500
In-reply-to: <4ef5fec60911161631p28e3c7ffxfe93aa03657ef750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4AFD55F8.9000409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ef5fec60911161631p28e3c7ffxfe93aa03657ef750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:31:09PM -0800, coderman@xxxxxxxxx wrote 1.9K bytes in 44 lines about:
: 
: I would omit the -Installation- and -for- part for brevity and replace
: Windows with Win32 as one day we may care about 64bit native builds.
: That is, Tor-Bundle-Win32-1.0
: Is the Installation part to distinguish from the no-install portable
: Tor browser bundle? That is the extent of my bike shed commentary :)

Yes.  The installation is there to distinguish from the TBB.

-- 
Andrew Lewman
The Tor Project
pgp 0x31B0974B

Website: https://torproject.org/
Blog: https://blog.torproject.org/
Identi.ca: torproject

References:
- Thoughts on changing our package names
  - From: Andrew Lewman
- Re: Thoughts on changing our package names
  - From: coderman

Next by Author: Thoughts on changing our package names
Previous by thread: Re: Thoughts on changing our package names
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread