[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tor on 64bit Windows (XP)
- To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tor on 64bit Windows (XP)
- From: Robert Ransom <rransom.8774@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:56:22 -0700
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 08:56:37 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=YaHZRvogHFj1I+4kT2aDEO940tNe4IlFOujAvx25MQk=; b=VY0Tl7p5IeXOWwhYBk1pp8+RI33spz/XO4ZOwTGNgEgLYNXMCzZrUBZmx1XgsMjXN1 Ag9+KYJofWz3rJnVcmlPpI/VU9Amc4W/PpT7fc+Z5M5MSqcv0RVh54a1FEq60ST+j+7t mK/t+DcmJiHZhVwf3eoBTfj3Nv9XLu1pp9hmE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=xYjVw4/yFpYnjjg9rpS6IOLrgf9Qn8Z5rxAzC8DaBCLqjj4k00d8p5KWFjRNbYlHC3 5g9NDrh1d7Ci7H8VmWx0/IMjfZ8zFiK3vKfdJnhDDWfEQbIsEUsfZakNnzLdDOFSp+Xv QFAyvJDYq+9WPx+qcavJ1juQGmCqkVrExAiig=
- In-reply-to: <4CD00764.60502@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4CD00764.60502@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:43:16 +0000
Cav <cav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Someone asked me about Tor on 64bit Windows XP.
> Does anyone have any thoughts on Tor running under XP @ 64bit ?
> I don't know if its just an issue of compiling it ?
>
> Im sure 32bit Tor can run under 64bit Windows 7 (well, im kinda sure(ish) )
It works for me.
Compiling Tor as a 64-bit program should make the cryptographic
operations a bit faster, but it's not necessary in order to run Tor on
64-bit Windows.
Robert Ransom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature