Philipp Winter: > I now have similar code which is based on stem: > https://github.com/NullHypothesis/exitmap > > However, the problem with a parallel single-Tor-process design > is that there is no easy way for scanning modules to figure out > which exit relay they were attached to. The Tor controller just > sees a bunch of incoming streams but once, one of these streams > spots something fishy, it is difficult to figure out which exit > relay is to blame. I am unsure about the meaning of the `cmd` parameter in the probe method of your modules. But, can't you pass the circuit ID (or an opaque wrapper object, actually) to the scanning module, and have the scanning module pass that to the stream attacher when it has a stream ready? (Feel free to ignore me if that sounds like non-sense. I only had a quick look at the code.) -- Lunar <lunar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev