[tor-dev] Using fingerprint of cached relay bypasses bridge?

[David Fifield <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Someone on #tor-project IRC reported that you can bypass your pluggable
transport if you use the fingerprint of an ordinary relay already known
to Tor in your bridge line. I would file a ticket but I haven't been
able to reproduce it.

The example the IRC user gave was this, meant to be pasted into Tor
Browser as a custom bridge:
	Bridge meek 0.0.2.0:2 3C3A6134E4B5B7D1C18AD4E86EE23FAC63866554 url=https://d2zfqthxsdq309.cloudfront.net/ front=a0.awsstatic.com
The fingerprint is the wrong one for this bridge. It should be
B9E7141C594AF25699E0079C1F0146F409495296 for the bridge nicknamed
TorLandMeek. It is instead for the relay nicknamed traffic70 at
188.138.1.166:9001.

The claim is that if tor has already cached a descriptor with
fingerprint 3C3A6134E4B5B7D1C18AD4E86EE23FAC63866554, then it will make
a direct connection for the purpose of making a one-hop circuit. "it's
about one hop tunnel when exit is entry" says the IRC user. They point
to these parts of the source code:

https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/src/or/circuituse.c?id=tor-0.2.8.9#n2010
	r = node_get_by_nickname(conn->chosen_exit_name, 1);
https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/src/or/circuituse.c?id=tor-0.2.8.9#n2015
	extend_info = extend_info_from_node(r, conn->want_onehop ? 1 : 0);

I wasn't able to reproduce it. I used this torrc file:

DataDirectory datadir
UseBridges 1
Bridge meek 0.0.2.0:2 3C3A6134E4B5B7D1C18AD4E86EE23FAC63866554 url=https://d2zfqthxsdq309.cloudfront.net/ front=a0.awsstatic.com
ClientTransportPlugin meek exec ./meek-client --log meek-client.log

First I tried with a cold cache, and got a fingerprint mismatch:

Nov 01 18:00:53.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 10%: Finishing handshake with directory server
Nov 01 18:00:54.000 [warn] Tried connecting to router at 0.0.2.0:2, but identity key was not as expected: wanted 3C3A6134E4B5B7D1C18AD4E86EE23FAC63866554 but got B9E7141C594AF25699E0079C1F0146F409495296.
Nov 01 18:00:54.000 [warn] Problem bootstrapping. Stuck at 10%: Finishing handshake with directory server. (Unexpected identity in router certificate; IDENTITY; count 1; recommendation warn; host 3C3A6134E4B5B7D1C18AD4E86EE23FAC63866554 at 0.0.2.0:2)

Then I commented out "UseBridges 1", let the bootstrap finish, and
uncommented "Use Bridges 1" again. I got the same output:

Nov 01 18:05:06.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 10%: Finishing handshake with directory server
Nov 01 18:05:09.000 [warn] Tried connecting to router at 0.0.2.0:2, but identity key was not as expected: wanted 3C3A6134E4B5B7D1C18AD4E86EE23FAC63866554 but got B9E7141C594AF25699E0079C1F0146F409495296.
Nov 01 18:05:09.000 [warn] Problem bootstrapping. Stuck at 10%: Finishing handshake with directory server. (Unexpected identity in router certificate; IDENTITY; count 1; recommendation warn; host 3C3A6134E4B5B7D1C18AD4E86EE23FAC63866554 at 0.0.2.0:2)

I used tcpdump to check for connections to 188.138.1.166, and didn't see
any.
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev